Table 1. Comparison of the chemical composition of the outer bark of Quercus variabilis and Quercus suber across different regions
| Q. variabilis | Q. suber |
| Republic of Korea | China | Portugal | Italy |
| Ash | 0.82 (± 0.03)a | 0.56 (± 0.02)b | 1.99 (± 0.12)a | 1.82 (± 0.63)a |
| Total extractive | 10.12 (± 1.49)a | 11.18 (± 0.07)a | 13.65 (± 0.22)a | 9.68 (± 1.42)a |
| CH2Cl2 | 1.22 (± 0.23)c | 6.18 (± 0.08)b | 3.26 (± 0.17)a | 3.25 (± 1.29)a |
| EtOH | 4.38 (± 0.52)a | 2.37 (± 0.31)b | 5.53 (± 0.14)a | 5.83 (± 0.80)a |
| H2O | 4.52 (± 0.90)a | 2.63 (± 0.46)a | 4.86 (± 0.41)a | 0.60 (± 0.52)b |
| Suberin | 50.19 (± 1.45)a | 44.12 (± 1.63)a | 30.09 (± 2.33)b | 47.63 (± 1.53)a |
| Total lignin | 18.65 (± 0.30)a | 21.80 (± 0.17)b | 24.90 (± 0.39)c | 19.42 (± 0.36)a |
| Klason lignin | 18.31 (± 0.22)a | 20.30 (± 0.25)b | 24.57 (± 0.45)a | 19.22 (± 0.41)a |
| Acid-Soluble lignin | 0.34 (± 0.12)a | 1.50 (± 0.08)b | 0.33 (± 0.08)a | 0.20 (± 0.10)a |
| Polysaccharide | 17.11 (± 0.37)a | 20.38 (± 0.42)a | 27.46 (±0.56)a | 20.12 (± 0.47)a |
| Monosaccharide |
| Glucose | 7.36 (± 0.49)a | 8.13 (± 0.76)a | 13.20 (± 0.44)a | 9.77 (± 0.64)a |
| Galactose | 1.31 (± 0.50)a | 1.94 (± 0.36)a | 1.82 (± 0.47)a | 1.17 (± 0.71)a |
| Xylose | 5.09 (± 0.73)a | 5.47 (± 0.62)a | 9.30 (± 0.67)b | 6.72 (± 0.43)a |
| Arabinose | 3.33 (± 0.85)a | 4.85 (± 1.62)a | 3.14 (± 0.35)a | 2.55 (± 0.40)a |
| Total content | 96.89 (± 0.73) | 98.04 (± 0.46) | 98.09 (± 0.72) | 98.76 (± 0.88) |
Values are expressed as mean ± SD.
Different superscript letters within the same row indicate statistically significant differences among groups (p < 0.05, one-way ANOVA, Tukey’s HSD).
ANOVA: analysis of variance, HSD: honest significant difference.