Table 4. Termicidal performance of two types of wood vinegar at different concentrations against Coptotermes curvignathus in a no-choice test with treated filter paper

Treatment		Termite mortality (%)	Mass loss after 21 days (%)
Source biomass	Concentration of treatment solution (%)	Termite mortality (%)	Mass loss after 21 days (%)
NFS	0	19.19 ± 14.95^a	33.40 ± 4.53^a
	2.5	57.58 ± 33.75^abc	26.90 ± 3.79^ab
	5	53.54 ± 28.64^abc	14.34 ± 5.43^cd
	7.5	70.20 ± 33.28^abc	15.32 ± 9.81^cd
	10	88.89 ± 14.32^bc	9.52 ± 8.04^cd
	12.5	100 ± 0^c	2.18 ± 0.31^d
MSF	0	20.20 ± 16.69^a	44.68 ± 3.83^a
	2.5	30.30 ± 6.06^ab	26.65 ± 2.53^bc
	5	70.71 ± 34.99^abc	22.86 ± 2.56^bc
	7.5	74.24 ± 30.26^abc	13.30 ± 1.41^cd
	10	91.92 ± 7.00^bc	17.40 ± 11.77^bcd
	12.5	100 ± 0^c	9.98 ± 5.10^cd

Means (N = 4) ± SD of 33 termites per replicate.
Means in the same column with the same letters are not significantly different (p < 0.05) according to Duncan’s multiple range test.
NFS: nipah fruit shells, MSF: mixture of shells and fiber.