Journal of the Korean Wood Science and Technology
The Korean Society of Wood Science & Technology
Original Article

Improvement of Fast-Growing Wood Species Characteristics by MEG and Nano SiO2 Impregnation

Fitria Cita DIRNA2, Istie RAHAYU3,, Lukmanul Hakim ZAINI3, Wayan DARMAWAN3, Esti PRIHATINI3
2Master student of IPB University, Bogor (16680), Indonesia
3Department of Forest Products, Faculty of Forestry, IPB University, Bogor (16680), Indonesia
Corresponding author: Istie RAHAYU (e-mail: istiesr@apps.ipb.ac.id, ORCID: 0000-0003-4902-564X)

© The Korean Society of Wood Science & Technology.

Received: Aug 09, 2019; Accepted: Dec 24, 2019

Published Online: Jan 25, 2020

Abstract

Jabon (Anthocephalus cadamba) is a fast-growing wood species that is widely utilized for light construction and other purposes in Indonesia. The objectives of the current study were to determine the effects of monoethylene glycol (MEG) and SiO2 nanoparticles (nano SiO2) impregnation treatment on the dimensional stability and density of jabon wood and to identify the characteristics of impregnated jabon wood. Wood samples were immersed in water (as untreated), MEG, 0.5% MEGSiO2, then impregnated by applying 0.5 bar of vacuum for 60 min, and then applying 2.5 bar of pressure for 120 min. The results showed that impregnation with MEG and Nano SiO2 had a significant effect on the dimensional stability of jabon wood. Polymers can fill cell walls in wood indicated by increasing weight percentgain, antiswelling efficiency, bulking effect, and density, then decreasing in water uptake value. Jabon wood morphology by using SEM showed that MEGSiO2 polymers can cover part of the pitsin the wood vessel wall of jabon. This finding was reinforced by EDX results showing that the silicon content was increased due to the addition of SiO2 nano. The XRD diffraction pattern indicated that MEGSiO2 treatment increased the degree of crystallinity in wood samples. Overall, treatment with 0.5% MEGSiO2 led to the most improvement in the dimensional stability of 5-year-old jabon wood in this study.

Keywords: impregnation; monoethylene glycol; nano SiO2; jabon; density; dimensional stability

1. INTRODUCTION

The development of community forests has been one of the solutions for overcoming the shortage of raw material for wood industries in Indonesia. These forests areusually planted with fast-growing species, such as jabon (Anthocephalus cadamba). Jabon naturally grows not only in Indonesia, but also in Australia, China, India, Malaysia, Papua New Guinea, the Philippines, Singapore, and Vietnam (Orwa et al., 2009). Jabon wood is widely used as wood packaging but it has numerous other potential applications, including raw material plywood, pulp and paper, building construction, and flooring. It has several drawbacks, however, namely low density (0.3 g/cm3) (Lestari et al., 2018), poor strength, and poor durability, which are primarily having a large proportion of juvenile wood. The large proportion of juvenile wood in jabon caused it can be harvested at 5,6, and 7 year-old (Martawijaya, 2005). In a previous study, Rahayu et al. (2014) found that 5 year-old jabon consists of 100% juvenile. Because the quality of juvenile wood is much lower than that of mature wood, it is not recommended for structural purposes (Bowyer et al., 2007). However, its quality could be improved through technological modifications of its structure.

One method of wood modification is impregnation, a process through which a molecular compound is penetratedinto the wood structure and there by increases the density and hardness of the wood. Impregnation of organic and inorganic compounds into wood structure by soaking or using vacuum pressure tube can be performed to improve physical properties of wood (Hadi et al., 2018; Hartono et al., 2016; Oh and Park, 2015). Impregnation research on fast-growing wood species in Indonesia has been widely performed, using styrene (Darma et al., 2002; Jasni et al., 2004) and methyl methacrylate (MMA) (Wardani et al., 2012; Hadi et al., 2013, 2015), wood vinegar and an animal adhesive (Arsyad et al., 2019), but little research has been done on impregnation with monoethylene glycol (MEG) and SiO2 nanoparticles (nano SiO2). MEG is a hygroscopic substance and can absorb twice its weight in water at 100% relative humidity (Budavari, 1989). Based on its perfect water-soluble characteristics and its relatively low cost, we selected MEG for use in this study. SiO2 nanoparticles (Nano SiO2) are single particles of silica dioxide, an inorganic metal oxide, with a diameter less than 100 nm. Nano SiO2 has been used as a polymer to increase the strength and improve the properties of modified wood (Dong et al., 2014). Nano particles resumably produce uniform distribution and penetration in wood, as well as providing low-viscosity properties (Fufa and Hovde, 2010). Impregnation of poplar (Populus spp.) wood with furfuryl alcohol (FA) and nano SiO2 was shown to effectively improve the properties of the wood (Dong et al., 2014). Further, Rahayu et al. (2019) found that impregnation of the wood of another fast-growing species, sengon (Falcataria moluccana), by MEG and nano SiO2 enhanced its dimensional stability. In this study, we used MEG and nano SiO2 impregnation technology to improve the quality of jabon wood.

The objectives of our research were to determine the effects of MEG and nano SiO2 impregnation treatment on the dimensional stability and density of jabon wood to identify the characteristics of impregnated jabon wood.

2. MATERIALS and METHODS

2.1. Materials

Five-year-old jabon wood was originated from the community forest in Bogor, West Java, Indonesia. The wood was cut to sample sizes of 2 cm × 2 cm × 2 cm based on British Standard (BS) 373 (BS, 1957) for testing, which assessed weight percent gain (WPG), antiswelling efficiency (ASE), water uptake (WU), bulking effect (BE), and density. The materials used in this study were MEG and nano SiO2 (diameter 15 ± 5 nm; Anhui Elite Industrial Co, Ltd, China).

2.2. Methods

The impregnation process began with drying samples at a temperature of 103 ± 2°C. Three treatment solutions were used in this study: water-treated as untreated; 50% MEG (vol/vol) in an aqueous solution; and 0.5% MEGSiO2, which contained 0.5% (wt/vol) SiO2 nano-particles in 50% MEG solution (Table 1). A sonicator (Cole Palmer) was used to mix MEG and nano-SiO2 at 40% amplitude for 60 min. The impregnation process was initiated with a vacuum of 0.8 atm for 60 minutes and followed by pressure at 2.5 bar for 120 minutes. The sample was wrapped with aluminum foil, kept at room temperature for 12 hours, and then dried in an oven at 100°C for 12 hours. The polymerization process was then carried out. The sample was then immersed in water for 24 hours for ASE and WU test, followed by drying in an oven at 103 ± 2°C until it reached constant weight. The impregnation method is adopted from Dong et al. (2014) and Rahayu et al. (2019). Five samples were used to test each treatment.

Table 1. Composition of MEG and nano SiO2 solutions used for impregnation.
Treatment MEG (mL) Water (mL) Nano SiO2 (g)
Untreated 0 1000 0
MEG 500 500 0
0.5% MEGSiO2 500 500 5
Download Excel Table

We used the formulas for calculating WPG, WU, BE (Hill, 2006), and ASE (Rowell and Ellis, 1978):

WPG % = W 1 W 0 / W 0 × 100 WU = W 2 W 1 / W 1 × 100 BE = V 1 V 0 / V 0 × 100 ASE % / Su St / Su × 100

Where,

W0 = the initial oven-dried weight of wood sample

W1 = the oven-dried wood sample weight after treatment

W2 = the weight of the wood sample after immersion in water for 24 h

V0 = the initial oven-dried volume of wood sample

V1 = the oven-dried wood sample volume after treatment

Su = the volume shrinkage of untreated wood sample

St = the volume shrinkage of treated wood sample

The density (Bowyer et al., 2007), ρ, was calculated after treatment, using the WPG and BE values, and evaluation of treatment-related changes used the untreated density as the baseline.

Morphology of jabon wood was examined by SEM coupled with EDX and XRD to assess the characteristics of the wood. The capability of MEG and nano SiO2 to penetrate inside cell wall was analyzed using SEM (Zeiss Evo 50 Type, Germany). Tangential sections of both treated and untreated samples (0.5 × 0.5 × 0.5 cm3) were mounted on conductive adhesives, sputtercoated with gold, and observed by SEM at an accelerating voltage of 15 kV, with a chamber pressure between 10 and 400 Pa, under (low vacuum mode) and a working distance of 8 mm. The impregnated samples were also analyzed by SEM coupled with EDX (Zeiss Evo 50 Type, Germany) using a spectra mode to analyze the chemical content in untreated and treated jabon wood.

The degree of crystallinity in untreated and treated jabon wood was analyzed by XRD. Jabon samples were milled with a Willey mill into a 40–60 mesh powder, and the crystallinity of each sample was evaluated by XRD with an XRD-7000 diffractometer (Shimadzu Co., Ltd., Japan). The measurements were conducted with Cu Kα radiation with a graphite monochromator at a constant voltage of 40 kV and an electric current of 30 mA over a 2θ scanning range of 5°–40° at a scanning speed of 2° min−1.

2.3. Data analysis

WPG, ASE, WU, BE, and density data were used in an analysis of variance (ANOVA) to characterize the effects of the water, MEG, and 0.5% MEGSiO2 impregnation treatments. The mean differences between the treatments were determined using Duncan’s multiple range test.

3. RESULTS and DISCUSSION

3.1. Dimensional stability and density of impregnated woods

The impregnation treatment with MEG and nano SiO2 had a significant effect on WPG, ASE, BE, WU, and density as shown in Table 2. The ANOVA results indicated that impregnation had a statistically significant effect on the WPG, ASE, BE, WU, and density (p < 0.05) (Table 3). The results of Duncan’s multiple comparison test (Table 2) confirm that the WPG, ASE, BE, WU, and densityvalues of the treated samples were significantly different from those of the water- and MEG-treated sample. The WPG, ASE, BE, and density values of samples treated with 0.5% MEGSiO2 were greater than those of samples treated with water or MEG. However, the 0.5% MEGSiO2 samples had lower WU values than samples treated with water or MEG. These findings are similar to those of Dong et al. (2014), who found that the WPG of poplar treated with FA and nano SiO2 was greater than that of wood treated with FA treated alone. Similar results was reported by Hartono et al. (2016), who concluded that higher WPG Oil Palm trunk after impregnation with phenol formaldehyde (PF) resulted in the increase of dimensional stability as shown by an increase of density. Wood density has a decisive effect on the physical and dynamic properties of wood (Lee and Lee, 2018; Zhang et al., 2018). In accordance with Hill (2006), the findings suggest that impregnation of wood with a polymer causes to penetrate and strengthen cell walls. The strengtheningis believed to occur through the polymer filling the void space within the cell wall.

Table 2. Results of WPG, ASE, BE, WU, and density
Treatment WPG (%) ASE (%) WU (%) BE (%) Density (g/cm3)
Untreated 0a 0a 112.2 (±11.1)c 2.2 (±0.5)a 0.31 (±0.03)a
MEG 46.8 (±10.1)b 55.8 (±9.4)b 64.4 (±4.0)b 4.2 (±0.6)b 0.44 (±0.04)b
0.5% MEGSiO2 56.7 (±3.3)c 67.2 (±9.0)c 31.7 (±6.1)a 6.3 (±0.8)c 0.46 (±0.04)b

WPG, weight percent gain; ASE, antiswelling efficiency; WU, water uptake; BE, bulking effect.

Values followed by the same letters show no real difference based on the Duncan test.

Download Excel Table
Table 3. F-values of variance analysis.
Source F-value
WPG ASE WU BE Density
Treatment 109.79** 88.00** 116.16** 44.28** 26.36**

WPG, weight percent gain; ASE, antiswelling efficiency; WU, water uptake; BE, bulking effect.

p < 0.05; indicates that treatment factor had a significant effect at a 95% confidence level.

Download Excel Table

The increasing ASE values were followed by the increasing WPG values. The highest ASE value of 67.2% and the highest WPG value of 56.7% were achieved with 0.5% MEGSiO2 treatment. The higher the ASE value, the less the wood is able to adsorb water vaporfrom the surrounding environment. Further, the addition of SiO2 nano can replace the bound water that exists within the cell wall. This result is in line with a report by Deka et al. (2007), who concluded that ASE values increased as WPG rose in Norway Spruce after impregnation with melamine formaldehyde (MF), it might be due MF resin is blocking the OHgroup within the cellulose chain.

The WU values of the samples treated with 0.5% MEGSiO2 were the lowest among all treatments. This outcome shows that the ability of wood to adsorb water decreases with the addition of MEG and nano SiO2. The decrease of water absorption indicates the reduction of wood hygroscopicity (Priadi et al., 2019). Hill’s(2006) suggestionthat if the cell wall is filled by a polymer then it will become stronger. A negative correlation was observed between WPG and WU, and as WPG increased, WU decreased. This finding may have been due to the MEG and MEGSiO2 filling the cell wall, minimizing the availability of space for water molecules.

The increase in the BE values suggests that adding MEGSiO2 via the impregnation process can improve wood dimension stability. The samples treated with 0.5% MEGSiO2 hadthe greatest BE values (6.3%). This finding indicated that the addition of MEG and Nano SiO2 as bulking agents is could be a reliable means of improving wood quality. The increasing BE values were accompanied by increasing WPG and density values. According to Hill (2006) polymerentering cell walls and strengthening can improve dimensional stability, and the extent of this effect likely depends on the amount of bulking agnt used. Bowyer et al. (2007) further pointed out that the higher the wood density, the greater the wood content in the cell wall and the cell wall can be make thicker via artificial means, such as thorugh the use of the bulking agents tested in this study.

Previous studies have highlighted that improvements in dimensional stability and mechanical properties in poplar wood were achieved by reducing the porosity of the wood by filling void space with urea formaldehyde and nano SiO2. These addition prevented moisture frompenetrating into wood (Jiang et al., 2013).

3.2. Jabon wood morphology (SEM analysis)

SEM analysis revealed the morphology of untreated jabon wood, usingmagnification of ×250 (Fig. 1a) and ×500 (Fig. 1b). Figures 1a and 1b show empty spaces in the pits and cell lumens. With the addition of MEG, jabon wood underwentmorphological changes, as shown in Figure 1c. MEG appears to partially cover the cell wall in a scattered pattern (Fig. 1d). The morphological differences between untreated jabon wood and treated jabon wood can be seen clearly.

wood-48-1-41_F1
Fig. 1. (a) Jabon untreated morphology with 250x magnification (b) Jabon untreated morphology with 500x magnification (c) Jabon MEG morphology with 250x magnification (d) Jabon MEG morphology with 500x magnification (e) Jabon 0.5% MEGSiO2 with 250x magnification (f) Jabon 0.5% MEGSiO2 with 500x magnification.
Download Original Figure

Figs. 1e and 1f show that MEG and nano SiO2 penetrated into vessel walls and evenly adhered to and cover cell wall of jabon. The SEM analysis revealed the likely cause of the increases in the WPG, ASE, BE, and density values and the decrease in the WU value in the treated jabon wood. The images illustrate that the addition of nano SiO2 can increase the MEG distribution, allowing the MEG to more readily enter, scatter, and even cover pits and vessel walls. Overall, the 0.5% MEGSiO2 treatment was the most optimal treatment of the threepolymer treatments investigated.

3.3. Composition element (Analysis using SEM-EDX)

The chemical composition of wood samples treated with water, MEG, and MEGSiO2 was determined by SEM-EDX, and the results are shown in Table 4. The untreated treatment and MEG resulted in no SiO2 content. In contrast, in the wood samples impregnated with 0.5% MEGSiO2 the silicon content of the wood samples reaching 3.03%. Thus,it can be concluded that there is silicon in the wood treated with MEGSiO2.

Table 4. Chemical composition of wood sample of jabon on various treatment of MEG and nano SiO2 impregnation.
Treatment Carbon (wt. %) Oxygen (wt. %) Silicon (wt. %)
Untreated 61.99 28.25 0
MEG 60.02 28.01 0
0.5% MEGSiO2 55.29 31.77 3.03
Download Excel Table
3.4. XRD analysis

Fig. 2 shows the XRD spectra of the untreated jabon wood samples and the treated samples (MEG and 0.5% MEGSiO2). The XRD wave peaks associated with the untreated treatment, MEG, and 0.5% MEGSiO2 occurred respectivelyat an angle for 2θ of 22.14°, 21.76°, and 22.08°. Furthermore, cellulose peaks were also detected at an angle for 2θ = 15.78°, 15.84°, and 15.30° corresponding to the peak of cellulose in the JCPDS data base I012 2θ = 22.6° and I101 2θ = 17.13°.

wood-48-1-41_F2
Fig. 2. XRD spectra jabon impregnated wood untreated, MEG, and 0.5% MEGSiO2.
Download Original Figure

Crystallinity is an important properties in polymers that exhibit bonds between molecular chains, resulting in a more orderly arrangement of molecules. In the Fig. 2 it can be seen that the peak of cellulose decreases with the addition of MEG and 0.5% MEGSiO2. It is suspected that MEG and 0.5% MEGSiO2 have an influence on the structure of the jabon wood. The addition of nano SiO2 used has semi-crystalline characteristics that can increase the cristallinity. Similar results were previously reported by Dirna (2019), who found that the degree of crystallinity of jabon wood was increased through MEG and silica treatment. Similar results were shown in Rahayu et al. (2019) study, that MEG and MEGSiO2 treatment can increased crystallinity of sengon wood.

The results of the XRD analysis show the effects of nano SiO2 addition onWPG, ASE, WU, BE, and the resulting density. There effects are supported by the appearance of silicone peaks in the diffraction field that correspond to the ICDC database. The results show that the addition of SiO2 nano increases the degree of crystallinity in the wood. High crystallinity indicates strong and rigid bonds between MEGSiO2 polymers.

4. CONCLUSION

MEG and nano SiO2 impregnation of the jabon wood had a significant effect on the resulting dimensional stability of the wood. Increases in WPG, ASE, BE, and density indicates that polymers can fill cell walls in wood, causing a decrease in WU value and a consequent reduction in the ability of jabon wood to adsorb water. Changes in jabon wood morphology with MEG treatment and MEGSiO2 treatment relative to untreateds were demonstrated by SEM analysis results showing that MEGSiO2 polymers can cover part of the pits in the wood vessel wall of jabon. This finding was reinforced by EDX results showing that the silicon content was increased due to the addition of nano SiO2. The XRD diffraction pattern indicated that MEGSiO2 treatment increased thedegree of crystallinity in wood samples. Overall, treatment with 0.5% MEGSiO2 led to the most improvement in the dimensional stability of 5-year-old jabon wood in this sample.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

This research was funded by Directorate for Research and Community Service of the Ministry of Research, Technology and Higher Education (RISTEKDIKTI), Republic of Indonesia with the contract number 3/E1/ KP.PTNBH/2019 March 29, 2019.

REFERENCES

1.

Arsyad WOM, Basri E, Hendra D, Trisatya DR. Termite resistance of impregnated jabon wood (Anthocephalus cadamba Miq.) with combined impregnant agents. Journal of the Korean Wood Science and Technology. 2019; 47(4):451-458.

2.

Bowyer JL, Shmulsky R, Haygreen JG. Forest Product and Wood Science: An Introduction. 20075th ed. Ames, Iowa, USA: Blackwell Publishing Professional. .

3.

British Standard (BS) Methods of Testing Small Clear Specimen of Timber. BS 373:1957. 1957 London, UK: British Standard Institution. .

4.

Budavari S. The Merck Index. An Encyclopedia of Chemicals, Drugs and Biological. 198911th ed. Rahway, NJ, USA: Merck and Co. Inc. .

5.

Darma IGKT, Hadi YS, Atmojo AT. Ketahanan komposit kayu plastik polistirena terhadap serangan jamur pelapuk coklat (Tyromyces palustris). Jurnal Manajemen Hutan Tropika. 2002; 8(1):31-38.

6.

Deka M, Gindl W, Wimmer R, Christian H. Chemical modification of Norway spruce (Picea abies (L) Karst) wood with melamine formaldehyde resin. Indian Journal of Chemical Technology. 2007; 14:134-138.

7.

Dirna FC. Characteristic of impregnated fast growing wood species by nano silica made from leaves of betung bamboo. Thesis. 2019 Indonesia: IPB University. .

8.

Dong Y, Yan Y, Zhang S, Li J. Wood/polymer nanocomposites prepared by impregnation with furfuryl alcohol and nano SiO2. BioResources. 2014; 9(4):6028-6040.

9.

Fufa SM, Hovde PJ. In: Natterer J., Sandoz J.L., editors. Nano-based modifications of wood and their environmental impact: review. 2010; In: Proc. of the World Conference on Timber Engineering (2010), Riva del Garda, Italy p. 1093-1094.

10.

Hadi YS, Massijaya MY, Zaini LH, Abdillah IB, Arsyad WOM. Resistance of methyl methacrylate-impregnated wood to subterranean termite attack. Journal of the Korean Wood Science and Technology. 2018; 46(6):748-755.

11.

Hadi YS, Rahayu IS, Danu S. Physical and mechanical properties of methyl methacrylate impregnated jabon wood. Journal of the Indian Academy of Wood Science. 2013; 10(2):77-80.

12.

Hadi YS, Rahayu IS, Danu S. Termite resistance of jabon wood impregnated with methyl methacrylate. Journal of Tropical Forest Science. 2015; 27(1):25-29.

13.

Hartono R, Hidayat W, Wahyudi I, Febrianto F, Dwianto W, Jang JH, Kim NH. Effect of phenol formaldehyde impregnation on the physical and mechanical properties of soft-inner part of oil palm trunk. Journal of the Korean Wood Science and Technol. 2016; 44(6):842-851.

14.

Hill CAS. Wood Modification: Chemical, Thermal and Other Processes. 2006 Chichester, UK: John Wiley and Sons Ltd. .

15.

Jasni Hadjib, N. Barly, Hadi YS, Afidudin Y. The resistence of wood polymer composite to the dry wood termite (Cryptotermes cynocephalus Light) and the subterranean termite (Coptotermes curvignathus Holmgreen) infestation. Indonesian Journal of Forestry Research. 2004; 1(1):50-59.

16.

Jiang Y, Wu G, Chen H, Shuping S, Pu J. Preparation on nano-SiO2 modified urea-formaldehyde performed polymer to enhance wood properties. Reviews on Advanced Materials Science. 2013; 33:46-50.

17.

Lee JM, Lee WH. Dimensional stabilization through heat treatment of thermally compressed wood of korean pine. Journal of the Korean Wood Science and Technology. 2018; 46(5):471-485.

18.

Lestari ASRD, Hadi YS, Hermawan D, Santoso A. Physical and mechanical properties of glued laminated lumber of pine (Pinus merkussii) and jabon (Anthocephalus cadamba). Journal of the Korean Wood Science and Technology. 46(2):143-148.

19.

Martawijaya A, Kartasujana I, Mandang YI, Prawira SA, Kadir K. Atlas Kayu Indonesia Jilid II. Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Kehutanan. 2005 Bogor: Departemen Kehutanan. .

20.

Oh SW, Park HJ. Vacuum pressure treatment of water-soluble melamine resin impregnation for improvement of dimensional stability on softwoods. Journal of the Korean Wood Science and Technology. 2015; 43(3):327-333.

21.

Orwa C, Mutua A, Kindt R, Jamnadass R, Anthony S. Agroforestry tree database: a tree reference and selection guide version 4.0. 2009http://www.worldagroforestry.org/treedb2/AFTPDFS/Anthocephalus_cadamba.pdf (accessed January 31, 2019)

22.

Priadi T, Sholihah M, Karlinasari L. Water absorption and dimensional stability of heat-treated fast-growing hardwoods. Journal of the Korean Wood Science and Technology. 2019; 47(5):567-578.

23.

Rahayu I, Darmawan W, Nugroho N, Nandika D, Marchal R. Demarcation point between juvenile and mature wood in sengon (Falcataria moluccana) and jabon (Anthocephalus cadamba). Journal of Tropical Forest Science. 2014; 26(3):331-339.

24.

Rahayu I, Darmawan W, Zaini LH, Prihatini E. Characteristics of fast-growing wood impregnated with nanoparticles. Journal of Forest Research. 2019 ISSN 1007-662X.

25.

Rowell RM, Ellis WD. Determination of dimensional stabilization of wood by water soak method. Wood Fiber Science. 1978; 10:104-111.

26.

Trung T, Cho WJ, Ha CS. Preparation of TiO2 nanoparticles in glycerol containing solution. Material Letters. 2003; 57:2746-2750.

27.

Wardani L, Risnasari I, Wardani L, Risnasari I, Yasni Hadi YS. In: Wardani L, Risnasari I, editors. Resistance of jabon timber modified with styrene and methyl methacrylate against drywood termites and subterranean termites. 2012; In: Proc. of 9th Pacific Rim Termite Research Group Conference, Hanoi, Vietnam p. 73-78.

28.

Zhang YH, Huang YX, Ma HX, Yu WJ, Qi Y. Effect of different pressing processes and density on dimensional stability and mechanical properties of bamboo fiber-based composites. Journal of the Korean Wood Science and Technology. 2018; 46(4):355-361.